SEEDIG Survey

Update:

The results of the survey are now available.                                                             IG cloud

Key findings:

  • The most frequent words used by respondents, when asked to define Internet governance, were: use, rules, regulation, procedures, and multistakeholder.
  • Privacy and data protection, digital divide and cybersecurity were identified as the most challenging Internet-related issues at national level.
  • Forty percent (40%) of the respondents believe that there are no efficient and effective mechanisms in place at national level to address the identified Internet-related challenges. Other 40% indicated they were not sure whether such mechanisms exist.
  • Eighty-one percent (81%) of the respondents were of the opinion that countries in South Eastern Europe and the neighbouring area share similar Internet-related challenges and concerns; the top three such similar challenges and concerns were: digital divide, privacy and data protection, and cybersecurity.
  • Seventy-one percent (71%) of the respondents indicated that there is value in having regional mechanisms and processes for stakeholders in SEE to discuss/address similar Internet related challenges.
  • Limited resources (financial, time, etc.) and lack of/insufficient awareness were identified as the main barriers to participation in national, regional and/or global Internet governance processes and organizations.
  • The need for more capacity building and awareness raising on Internet governance issues was emphasized frequently throughout the survey responses.


‘Can we SEE Internet governance?’  – This is the overarching theme for the SEEDIG 2016 meeting.  And a question we hope to find some answers to through an Internet governance (IG) survey that we are launching now.

We are trying, through this survey, to get a better understanding of how Internet governance, in general, and Internet governance issues and processes, in particular, are perceived by the Internet community in South Eastern Europe and the neighbouring area (SEE). It covers aspects such as: interest and participation in IG processes and organizations (motivation, challenges, opportunities), Internet-related issues considered as most pressing at national level and in SEE, degree of satisfaction with national, regional and global IG mechanisms, etc.

The survey data will be compiled and reflected in a report to be presented at the SEEDIG meeting (22 April 2016, Belgrade). This report could help set the scene for the April discussions.

We would appreciate if you could take some 20 minutes of your time and fill in this survey. 

We value your contribution and we thank you in advance.


Comments are closed